PH is looking in the wrong direction for support

By Stephen Ng

The Pakatan Government, especially component party Bersatu, needs to understand that the last general election was won with the support of a majority Chinese, Indian and East Malaysian votes.

Only 30% of the Malays voted for PH in the last general election. To therefore submit to the political narrative of the other 70% Malays who voted for Pas and Barisan Nasional is a big let down for the voters like me who helped to put PH in power.

Whether the PH remains in power in the next general election will depend largely on where the current supporters put their votes. With just a slight shift in the voting trend, PH can be thrown out of Putrajaya.

With such a precarious situation that PH is finding itself in, I find it hard to understand why it is still playing the old politics of trying to appease BN supporters at the expense of those who have supported PH.

When the recognition of the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) was brought up, just some noise made by Umno Youth was enough for the spineless Education Minister Maszlee Malik to withhold the recognition under the pretext of doing a holistic study.

Now, the government is contemplating the ratification of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).

It is yet to be seen if the PH government would go ahead to do what is right or it would bow to political pressure from the Opposition.

Many of us are shocked at how former Umno minister, Rais Yatim can now turn around and say that the Ketuanan Melayu was never in the federal constitution, and that it was only a "political battle cry".

Was he not one of those who pushed for the Ketuanan Melayu agenda to the point that it destroyed the country's social fabrics? 

Supposedly graduated with a PhD in law from the University of London, he was spiteful in the way he spoke to a reporter. This is obviously the attitude of a supremacist Malay, who should not have studied in Great Britain. 

If he could not respond to a question in English in the way many other ministers responded to journalists with decorum, he should have obtained his PhD from some universitas in Indonesia. It was unbecoming in the way he behaved when he was later appointed a minister of culture. 

In fact, what kind of culture did he represent with his (using his own words) mulut celupar? This is the Ketuanan Melayu that he was portraying all along.

  

It would have been a disaster had Rais been picked as the parliamentary speaker. I cannot imagine him speaking like this in the august house. The present speaker, Mohamad Arif Md Yusof is far more honourable.

Back to the PH manifesto. Surely anything that the PH government seeks to do, Umno or the lone ranger in MCA would create a ruckus. There will be demonstrations. After all, this is what Umno has been training its men and women to do.

Their objective, of course, is to create dissatisfaction of the rakyat towards Pakatan Harapan and to win back Putrajaya. PH will never (I repeat, will never) win these hardcore Umno and Pas supporters. Their intention is to derail the policy drawn out by PH.

But for many of us, it is unlikely that we would vote for Barisan Nasional at least in the next general election. We know that the moment BN is back, people like Najib Abdul Razak, Rosmah Mansor, Shafie Abdullah and their cronies would go scots free. The nation's wealth would be plundered again.

No, we won't vote for BN unless PH fails us in fulfilling the promises made in the manifesto. We won't vote for BN unless BN has reformed itself and proved to be more capable to run the country, this time with the help of men and women of integrity. The old hats cannot be trusted to run the country.


END.

Tan Keng Liang, think before you speak

Photo credit: Malaysiakini

By Stephen Ng

Gerakan Youth Chief, Tan Keng Liang appears to be bankrupt of ideas every time he speaks.

In his latest statement, he questioned if Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad would expose a letter from PAS Kelantan asking the Finance Ministry for money to pay the salaries of civil servants.

This has nothing to do with Gerakan, but Tan chose to pick a bone with Finance Minister, Lim Guan Eng.

I find this amusing. Lim had made a comment in passing when he responded to Kelantan MPs who wanted to know if the federal government would proceed with the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) should the Kelantan State Government come out with its fund.

Kelantan MPs took offence of his remark that the Kelantan State Government has no money even to pay the salaries of civil servants in the state.

As a member of the public, I would surely like to know whether the remark made by Lim holds water.

Lim did the right thing to read out the letter written by the Kelantan State Government to settle any lingering doubts about the statement he made in parliament.

After all, the letter was not stamped Official Secrets Act (OSA). It is a correspondence between the Kelantan State Government and the Federal Government.

So, why can't Lim provide evidence to back up what he said? And, why Tan should pick up the issue as though there are more important issues to address.

Grow up, Tan!

END.

Civil Servants Must be Polite at All Times

Source: https://mothership.sg/2015/10/man-takes-to-facebook-to-accuse-changi-airport-immigration-officer-of-infringing-his-rights/

By Stephen Ng


Comment: Reading the story about how an immigration officer treated a man who applied for a social visit pass extension for his pregnant Indonesian wife, I cannot help but recall an incident happening at the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority of Singapore.

Although this incident happened about 10 years ago, I can still remember vividly the immigration officer who shares the same surname as mine.

It was very late at night, and I did not realise that I had walked into their auto-gate system, thinking that it was similar to the auto-gate system at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport. The immigration officer shouted at me rudely: "Do you think this is the auto-gate system in your country?" I retorted back: "Excuse me, Sir! Can you be a bit more polite?"
He took my passport away and went back to his office. I waited by the side while he checked my particulars on the computer system. It took some time before I called out to him, "Sir, is there anything wrong with my passport? If nothing, I want my passport back."

To my horror, the officer shouted at the top of his voice. Provoked by his rude behaviours, I told him off: "Sir, I will definitely be lodging a complaint against you for your rude behaviours. This I promise you!"

I took my passport and joined the queue.

On arrival home the next morning, I immediately wrote an email to the Immigration chief in Singapore. I also sent emails to the Minister of Home Affairs in Singapore as well as to the Malaysian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Syed Hamid Albar.

My Singaporean reporter friend advised me to also write to several Members of Parliament in Singapore, after he heard that the Immigration Office in Singapore had defended their officer.
He told me that the MPs in Singapore are very efficient. If any complaints to their attention, especially the Opposition Leader, things would move very fast. Unfortunately, I proved my friend wrong. Singaporean MPs are hopeless.

I finally sent an email to the Prime Minister of Singapore, Mr Lee Hsien Loong and within 24 hours, I received a reply from his private secretary claiming that investigation had been carried out and the officer was not in the wrong.

Such was the response from the Prime Minister's office. I had no choice but to reply with the following words to the effect of saying: "Sir, if this had happened at Tullamarine Airport, the immigration officers there would have told me, 'Excuse me, Sir, but you are on a wrong queue.' This is the difference between a country where people are more polite, compared to a country with rough and rowdy immigration officers like Singapore."

I left it at that. This incident has given me a very negative impression of Singapore as a country that its people lack a sense of courtesy.

Another story showing the lack of culture in the immigration officers at Singapore Immigration & Checkpoints Authority.


END.

Tough for Zahid to prove his innocence

By Stephen Ng


It is not difficult to say that A. Zahid Hamidi and his wife's credit card expenses simply do not add up.

RM800,000 is a lot of money for most Malaysians, and for the couple to spend that amount of money raises questions as to where they obtain the money. It is close to a million Ringgit.

The six million dollar question is: "How on earth did Zahid and his wife spend so much using their credit cards?"

The deputy prime minister would have to earn at least RM2 million a year for the couple to spend that amount. Does a deputy prime minister's salary touch anywhere near RM2 million per annum? I doubt.

 So, when Zahid said that it was his staff's mistake when cheques were issued using funds from Yayasan Akal Budi to pay the credit card bills, I could only roll my eyes in disbelief.

What may appear obvious to me is that Yayasan Akal Budi was set up as a front to receive bribes in the form of donations. Until the Prosecution proves it in court, my suspicion remains a suspicion.

Zahid will have a tough time to prove that he has the means to pay an accumulated credit card bill of RM800,000. There are over 44 other charges that he has to prove his innocence.

This is going to be very tough for Zahid. Even when his men stand in solidarity with him but as Umno president, if he fails to defend himself, he will be sent to jail.

It is interesting that although one of his foot soldiers had blasted out his call to rally for Zahid, only 200 people turned up at the Kuala Lumpur High Court, which works out to be only one percent of the people whom he had broadcast the messages.

People like Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, Adnan Mansor and the infamous Jamal Mohd Yusof were surprisingly missing in action.

Zahid knows that his chances of winning the case are very slim. Could this be the reason why he went to see Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad recently?

Any effort to merge Bersatu or PKR with Umno would surely cause a big revolt among the voters and both Tun Mahathir and prime minister designate, Anwar Ibrahim know this very well.

People's confidence in the present government and the cabinet will help it to take Malaysia to the next level. Therefore, Zahid has very slim chances of saving himself and former prime minister, Najib Abdul Razak.

For all Malaysians, the next two or three years, we will be seeing all the evidences brought to court. If the appeals are rejected at both the Court of Appeal and Federal Court, then Sungai Buloh prison officers will have the privilege of looking after a few more VIP prisoners.

The Malaysian Government has to uphold justice and be seen upholding justice.

The details of the charges are as follows:

Criminal breach of trust

1. Criminal breach of trust involving RM537,513.64 from welfare foundation Yayasan Akal Budi between Jan 13, 2014 and Dec 23, 2014.

2. Criminal breach of trust involving RM38,070.49 from Yayasan Akal Budi between Feb 19, 2014 and Oct 29, 2014.

3. Criminal breach of trust involving RM107,509.55 from Yayasan Akal Budi between Jan 22, 2015 and Sept 23, 2015.

4. Criminal breach of trust involving RM708,134.47 from Yayasan Akal Budi between Jan 27, 2015 and Aug 21, 2015.

5. Criminal breach of trust involving RM3,914.84 from Yayasan Akal Budi on March 20, 2015.

6. Criminal breach of trust involving RM17,953,185.21 from Yayasan Akal Budi between June 23, 2015 and June 28, 2015 .

7. Criminal breach of trust involving RM30,635.80 from Yayasan Akal Budi on July 9, 2015.

8. Criminal breach of trust involving RM100,000 from Yayasan Akal Budi on Aug 20, 2015.

9. Criminal breach of trust involving RM1,300,000 from Yayasan Akal Budi on Nov 23, 2015.

10. Criminal breach of trust involving RM54,168.99 from Yayasan Akal Budi on Jan 11, 2016.

Receiving gratification

11. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM250,000 cheque from Mastoro Kenny IT Consultant & Services to help the company get a MyEG project on Jul 15, 2016.

12. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting 13 cheques worth RM8 million from Mastoro Kenny IT Consultant & Services to help the company get a MyEG project between Dec 7, 2016 and Jan 5, 2017.

13. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting 10 cheques worth RM5 million from Mastoro Kenny IT Consultant & Services to help the company get a MyEG project on Feb 8, 2017.

14. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM5 million cheque from Datasonic Group Bhd director Chew Ben Ben on April 26, 2017. Datasonic had won a direct tender contract from Home Ministry to supply Malaysian passport chips.

15. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM1 million cheque from Datasonic Group Bhd director Chew Ben Ben on April 26, 2017.

16. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM300,000 cheque from Profound Radiance Sdn Bhd director Azlan Shah Jaffril on Aug 3, 2017. Profound Radiance runs migrant visa one-stop centers in Pakistan and Nepal.

17. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM1 million cheque from Profound Radiance Sdn Bhd director Azlan Shah Jaffril on Jan 9, 2018.

18. Receiving gratification as Home Minister for accepting a RM700,000 cheque from Profound Radiance Sdn Bhd director Azlan Shah Jaffril on March 15, 2018.

Money laundering

19. Money laundering by depositing RM3.8 million as a fixed deposit on May 27, 2016.

20. Money laundering by depositing RM3 million as a fixed deposit on June 14, 2016.

21. Money laundering by depositing RM4.6 million as a fixed deposit on June 14, 2016.

22. Money laundering by depositing RM3 million as a fixed deposit on June 16, 2016.

23. Money laundering by depositing RM9,350,265.21 as a fixed deposit on July 13, 2016.

24. Money laundering by depositing RM5,460,361.14 as a fixed deposit on July 21, 2016.

25. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Aug 29, 2016.

26. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Sept 13, 2016.

27. Money laundering by depositing RM1.2 million as a fixed deposit on Nov 7, 2016.

28. Money laundering by depositing RM619,680.70 as a fixed deposit on Jan 6, 2017.

29. Money laundering by depositing RM3 million as a fixed deposit on Jan 9, 2017.

30. Money laundering by depositing RM1.2 million as a fixed deposit on Jan 17, 2017.

31. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Feb 15, 2017.

32. Money laundering by depositing RM1.2 million as a fixed deposit on April 14, 2017.

33. Money laundering by depositing RM6 million as a fixed deposit on April 28, 2017.

34. Money laundering by depositing RM8,348,040.90 as a fixed deposit on May 11, 2017.

35. Money laundering by depositing RM1.8 million as a fixed deposit on Aug 17, 2017.

36. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Oct 10, 2017.

37. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Nov 17, 2017.

38. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Dec 20, 2017.

39. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Jan 17, 2018.

40. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on Feb 14, 2018.

41. Money laundering by depositing RM700,000 as a fixed deposit on March 20, 2018

42. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on March 20, 2018.

43. Money laundering by depositing RM600,000 as a fixed deposit on April 11, 2018.

44. Money laundering by purchasing two bungalows in Mukim Kajang, Hulu Langat, Selangor for RM5.9 million on Jan 9, 2017.

45. Money laundering by ordering the conversion of RM6,885,270.20 in cash into 30 cheques to be used for fixed deposits between March 29, 2016 and July 15, 2016.

Source: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/447983

END.

How can lawmakers smoke in the august house?

Photo credit: Malaysiakini 


By Stephen Ng


I find amusing when Malaysian lawmakers would make a fuss of the "No Smoking" ban in the parliament.

What exactly is it that makes the elected members of parliament different from the rest of us? Surely, they are not above the law!

If universities have turned their campuses into "No Smoking" Zones, there is no reason why the august house cannot accept the reform that we have desired so much to see. If the ban is on all government buildings and hospitals, what makes the Malaysian parliament any difference?

The smoke from the cigarettes will be recycled in an airconditioned environment, and this affects the health of a few hundred people at any one time.

In the past, the Barisan Nasional regime had no political will to impose the "No Smoking" ban on the Parliament; but now, when there is a minister who is willing to stand up for doing what is right, why of all persons does Backbencher Chairman Johari Abdul seek to even speak up on behalf of the complainants?

There are more important issues that he should raise for the attention of the Administration in order to make this country a better place for everyone. Why talk about the "No Smoking" ban in parliament?

Is it not a waste of the lawmakers' time? Are their salaries not paid by taxpayers? So, why are they talking on matters like this that do not affect the rakyat? If the ban is imposed in the Parliament, who cares! We have better things to do than to care whether lawmakers get to smoke anywhere in the parliament or within its compound.

If the Minister of Health, Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad has imposed a ban on smoking in the parliament, let it be! The Speaker has no problem with it, so why raise this in parliament?

Also, what the heck does Kinabatangan MP, Bung Mokhtar Radin think he is when he said, and I quote: "I feel that the Health Ministry has been discriminatory towards smokers. It appears that the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community has more rights than smokers."

I wonder where has Bung Mokhtar's grey matter gone to or whether he even qualifies to be a lawmaker. If he thinks he is a fighting cock in the parliament, he better think twice because the Rakyat is watching him.

Photo Credit: https://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/447957

If Bung Mokhtar cannot take the "No Smoking" ban, he should just quit being a member of the august house. He can build himself a chimney and smoke all that he wants, but please, do not do it at the expense of other people's health.

I applaud Dr Dzulkefly's bold move. The ban is for the sake of many lawmakers who have to otherwise suffer the secondary smoke from smokers.

It is perhaps time for the Ministry of Health to impose the "No Smoking" zone in state government offices, including the offices of State Excos.

This article is also published here.

END.

Myth of Language leading to so-called National Unity

By Stephen Ng

In a recent forum, “'Malaysia: A New Dawn', former Minister of International Trade and Industries, Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz commented about Education Minister, Dr Maszlee Malik’s slogan ‘Mempertabatkan Bahasa Malaysia’.

I would like to add to her rhetoric. To me, promoting Bahasa Malaysia to strengthen national unity is nothing but a myth.

This slogan, based on Shih Huang Ti’s efforts to unite the many kingdoms into one country using Mandarin as the official language has been sung by Umno propagandists time and again for many decades.

This narrow mindedness of people in the likes of Tan Sri Rais Yatim has sidelined English and other vernacular languages. This has destroyed the country’s competitiveness in the international arena.

How can Malaysia be an Asian tiger if its people can hardly speak standard English and communicate with the rest of the world? 

With Bahasa Malaysia, we can only reach out to people in the so-called Nusantara.

With English and the vernacular languages, we can conquered at least two-thirds of the world, but after all these years of promoting Bahasa Malaysia at the expense of other languages, we have become a kampung within a world of mega cities and metropolitans.

Even China has caught up with the rest of the world, with its people capable of speaking good English, compared to our Chinese in Malaysia.

With China fast becoming an economic powerhouse in this region, Mandarin is an important communication tool when trading with the Chinese. Mandarin, Tamil and Hindi are spoken by nearly two billion people or one third of the world’s population.

By all means, Bahasa Malaysia should be promoted extensively. It is embarrassing to learn that one can use the “Read Aloud” App on iPhones for example to read aloud text in Mandarin, but not in Bahasa Malaysia. What is Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka doing about it when we are supposed to be championing the language?

As pointed out by Rafidah, our politicians in Malaysia Baru including Maszlee are still singing the slogan that learning of Bahasa Malaysia will lead to national unity.

Why do I call it a myth? The answer is simple. Look at the way how Malays voted in the last general election. Sixty percent of the country’s population voted in three directions. All speak Bahasa Malaysia and practise the same religion, but where is the unity?

The Chinese, Indians, Dayaks and Kadazan Dusun united together with one-third of the Malays to vote out the old regime, bringing about a new dawn in Malaysia. 

We each speak different languages, yet whenever a ceramah is conducted using the common language, everyone understood, and a bond was created.

In some ceramah, politicians spoke in Mandarin and Tamil as well, yet they were able to rally the different races together to oust Barisan Nasional. If Maszlee is able to speak in Tamil, I am sure he would have used the language as well to woo the Indian voters in his constituency.

So, why after the general election, we see the U-turn, to the point that the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) cannot be recognised until Bahasa Malaysia is given the pre-eminence in these private Chinese schools? This is nothing but an excuse we have often heard from Umno in the past.

Why are we still thinking that Bahasa Malaysia alone will unite the nation when this is just a myth that Umno has believed in for so many decades?

I suggest that if you have time, go and watch a famous sitcom in the seventies, “Empat Sekawan.” Tan Ah Chek spoke in Hokkien, while Wong Ho and Hon Yin spoke in Cantonese. Lai Meng spoke in Hakka, although her mother tongue was Cantonese. 

All four of them understood each other despite using different dialects. In real life, they were, in fact, good friends.  

What united them together since their days in Bukit Bintang was not the language but the fact that they were fellow Malaysians with a common direction in life.

Malaysians have proven that with race, religion and language set aside, we were able to unite in the last general election. 

Can’t we unite ourselves with a common vision to bring Malaysia to the next level, putting aside our differences in race, religion and language, that otherwise would divide us?

I hope after reading my article, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad would advise his cabinet to make a paradigm shift if we want to see Malaysia become an Asian Tiger again. 

We have what it takes to trade with the rest of the world using the language our trading partners are most comfortable with. Let us not lose our diversity.

There is unity in diversity. Commonness only leads to Communism.

STEPHEN NG is an ordinary citizen with an avid interest in following political developments in the country since 2008. After May 9, 2018, he is now involved in contributing ideas towards rebuilding of the nation.

Open letter to Tun Dr Mahathir

By Stephen Ng


Dear Tun,

One of the promises in the election manifesto was to solve the issue of stateless people.

Their plight has been highlighted far and wide in the local media, and promises have also been made to give citizenship to people who were born in Malaysia.

No thanks to your officers at National Registration Centre (JPN), things are not moving as we have expected. While fake identify cards have been identified throughout the country, in particular Sabah, genuine cases of children born to at least one Malaysian parent have been denied of citizenship.

I wish to remind you that once upon a time, you wanted the country’s population to reach 70 million. We are only half way to achieve this target, yet we are not giving enough attention to solve the stateless people’s issue.

A couple of months ago, when Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng opened up a service counter to help stateless people, he was shocked to see a long queue waiting to see him.

People like Lateefah Koya, N. Surendran and Eric Paulssen have been working tireless to help the stateless chidlren. Your cabinet ministers have also met up with you to discuss about the stateless people in the country.

This is the extent of the problem. It is not only affecting one particular race, but thousands of people who have not known any other country other than Malaysia. After all, how could they travel without ever having the chance to hold a Malaysian passport?

If the officers at JPN are the ones who are dragging their feet, perhaps, it is time for you to revamp both JPN and the Ministry of Home Affairs. We can no longer tolerate civil servants who are acting like little Napoleons.

I have at hand the case of a 11-year-old girl who has been diagnosed of Systemic Lupus Ertythematosus (SLE). Because of her statelessness, the initial treatment at a public hospital has cost the family some RM2,000.

The matter has been brought to the attention of Minister of Health, Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad who, together with his special officer, have gone the extra mile. Dr Dzulkefly has even offered to help the family financially, but this does not seem right especially when the child is stateless not by choice.
At the same time, doctors at the hospital have been very helpful but they can only do so much.

Over the long term, treatment is going to very costly for the family because the child, despite being born and raised in Malaysia, is treated like a foreigner. This is downright injustice happening behind my eyes.

I wish to also highlight the case of Rosiah Abdullah, who attracted our attention. Despite being a STPM top scorer, the brilliant student from SMK Kg Kapar could not enter public universities.

While the Deputy Minister of Education, Teo Nie Ching has recently announced that stateless children should now be able to enrol in institutions of higher learning, Rosiah’s status has not changed after May 9.

I do not believe this is a case where the promises in the manifesto cannot be fulfilled but, as acting Home Minister, you have to issue your directive to set up a task force to handle all the cases.

Let me quote W.H. Auden: “We are here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don’t know.” Let us use whatever power vested on us to get things sorted for that will impact people’s lives.

STEPHEN NG is an ordinary citizen with an avid interest in following political developments in the country since 2008. Now, he is contributing towards nation building.

https://goo.gl/images/kRkeJT

Which soldier works without a salary?

 

Photo credit: The Star 

Which soldier works without a salary?

By Stephen Ng

I refer to the letter, “Dawn of Better Civil Service” by chairman of Asli Centre for Public Policy Studies, Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam.

Written by a former civil servant himself, this letter reveals much about the state of the civil service today.

We, the members of the public, would like to convey a strong message to the Chief Secretary, Datuk Seri Dr Ismail Bakar that he has an important role to play to reform the civil service.

May 9 marks the change of government. With it, we want to see important reforms in the civil service.

With over 1.6 million civil servants in this country, we are probably one of the highest in terms of ratio of civil servants to the population.

One civil servant serves only 19 persons, compared to Singapore with one civil servant to 71.4 people and United Kingdom 1:118 (see table below from Nazir Razak).

This shows how inefficient our civil service is. Since 2003, the salaries paid to the civil servants have risen more than three-fold from RM22 billion to RM74 billion due to the excesses of the previous regime.

With the much needed reforms, Dr Ismail has to be firm as the chief secretary. There cannot be any compromises with any civil servant that tries to sabotage the reform process.

An urgent issue that he should immediately investigate is the non-payment of salaries to staff who came in with their ministers after the cabinet was set up.

Some of the ministers’ aides are also paid on contract basis based on the number of days they work in a month.  

Which government hires its staff and not paying their salaries for nearly half a year? What on earth is happening to the people who are supposed to be paying the salaries?

Obviously, there are people within the civil service who are trying to sabotage the new Government. This cannot be tolerated. The people responsible for the non-payment of salaries should be hauled up to face the music.

I am told that one of the ministers even had to fork out money from his own salary to help his staff. How long can he do that?

Not mincing my words, we demand an explanation from the Chief Secretary and how is it that this can be overlooked.

STEPHEN NG is an ordinary citizen with an avid interest in following political developments in the country since 2008. After May 9, 2018, he is now involved in contributing ideas towards rebuilding of the nation.

Three Cheers to Uncle Lim

In the course of my hobby and work, I meet all sorts of people all the time.

From millionaires to celebrities and politicians, I do not think of them as anyone more special than the janitor in the civic hall; therefore, I hardly ask to take pictures unless I have special admiration for them.

Being not photogenic, most of the time, I am dragged along to take photographs with people.

To date, I have only asked to take pictures with the late Tan Sri Ani Arope (former TNB chief), Chinese sitcom actress Lai Meng (of Empat Sekawan fame) and Amanah President, Mat Sabu. Kit Siang is the latest in my list. Perhaps, if there is a chance, I would like a photograph with Rafidah Aziz, and not only Siti Hasmah but Dr Mahathir Mohamad 2.0 as well.

I was invited to a dinner where both the elder Lim and the Junior Lim were there. Guan Eng was my senior at Monash back in the eighties and now a cabinet minister. I could have easily asked to take a photograph with him. Nothing wrong with him, but I only chose to be photographed with Kit. Why?

The reason is simple. Kit is a legend. I have read a lot of what he had to say when he was Mr Opposition. Even now, he speaks his mind. For many years, I have agreed with what he has to say about us being Malaysians.

Although he could have been made a senior minister in Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's cabinet, he chose to lead a simple life. For all the years that he has served the country, often sacrificing even his personal freedom, Kit was not seeking for a position or another one of those sought-after awards.

There is a saying that when you throw a stone, you will likely hit a Datuk. But this legend stands out from the rest, and without a title, he deserves my respect.

Kit is not the type that is looking for money or government projects. He exemplifies the slogan, "Service Above Self." In fact, I came up with a slogan to remind all our YBs who were elected on May 9, 2018. The $ sign has a big S which stands for Service. In short, when you see the $ sign, think of this: ‘I Serve.’

Kit is an ordinary man on the street. He can walk around without a bodyguard, and everyone will recognise him. To this man who has contributed much to this nation, I would like to give him a standing ovation.

In fact, his whole lifetime is spent on Opposition politics, not something that is easy to do. He has indeed served the nation well. Like it or not, at the end of his life, I earnestly think that he is worthy of a Tunship.

END.

The Need for Ombudsman Malaysia

By Stephen Ng


For many years, I have been waiting anxiously for the setting up of both the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) and Ombudsman Malaysia (Ombudsman).

I have written about it. But, under the Barisan Nasional government, we saw the great resistance from the police to block the setting up the IPCMC.

It therefore brings me great joy when the Pakatan Government agreed to also set up the Ombudsman.

A quick check on the Internet, the Ombudsman is defined as "a government official (as in Sweden or New Zealand) appointed to receive and investigate complaints made by individuals against abuses or capricious acts of public officials."

A lot of issues affecting us have to do with the lack of good work ethics in the mindset of our civil servants. Many of our civil servants are one-eyed Jacks. Now they see, now they don't!

With over 1.5 million civil servants, it is not difficult for anyone to imagine how advanced we can be as a nation if our civil servants have good work attitudes. Sadly, the reality is just the opposite despite a new government has taken over Putrajaya.

Corruption has long been entrenched in our civil service society to the point that even the office boys will ask for kickbacks if we want our documents processed fast. This gives rise the runners who pay to get jobs done.

But, when you as an ordinary person complains, you do not get the attention that you deserve unless, of course, you are a member of cabinet. Does this sound familiar?

For the past 25 years, I have been following up on a number of government agencies, departments and ministries -- from City Halls, Municipal Councils to the Land Office and the , and from Ministry of Housing & Local Government to the Ministry of Education.

To those that are good, I give the credit, but mostly, I had to crack the whip in order to see the results. Because I am persistent, I take the trouble to go all the way to the top or expose the issue in the press.

Often, with a camera in hand, I would write about issues affecting people, and the moment the article appears in one of the newspapers, solution would be at hand. This was particularly true during Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's tenure as the fourth prime minister of Malaysia. But things deteriorated, and it got worse during Najib Abdul Razak's time.

A number of years ago, when I was working with an private institution of higher learning, I discovered a number of our local and international students using a monsoon drain below the highway to get across to their apartment.

After I wrote an article for The Star Metro using the pseudonym, David Ng, the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) finally responded by building a flyover across the highway.

In another case, a housing estate has been without streetlights for at least 25 years. After I wrote a one-page article in Malay Mail, on the same day, Tenaga Nasional employees came to plant the streetlights.

They worked non-stop from noon till very late at night to install the streetlight poles. There was a lot of joy in the residents when their streets were finally lit up. I later learnt that it was the late Tan Sri Ani Arope who acted upon reading my article. His personal assistant and I became good friends since then. Tan Sri Ani and I also communicated frequently in the last few years of his life. A great man of virtue, indeed!

To solve problems, I had to use the media to hype up the issues in order to get some attention. For example, when I discovered that my Mom had a Qualified Title (Hakmilik Sementara) for 40 years, it took me two to three years with the help of the Member of Parliament, Dr Tan Seng Giaw and a lot of publicity in the media to finally get the titles changed to Full Titles (Geran) for the entire housing estate.

Not many people know this but I was the one who forced the predecessor to the Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), Celcom, Maxis and Telekom to look into the use of 999 as an emergency line on mobile phones. It started when I discovered that if you dialled 999 on the mobile phone back in the 90s, it would go to the nearest district police station (IPD). At night, there would be no one picking up the phone. After much negotiation following my highlight, finally the telcos agreed to use a central emergency response unit. You can now dial 999 (or 112) on your mobile phone, and the line would be connected to a centre that manages all emergency calls. 

There were many other issues that I had to pursue at great length before I saw the outcome. Even at this point in time, I am involved in a number of issues affecting others and I am pursuing all the way to achieve the results.

Despite many letters and meetings with the civil servants, often nothing gets done at the end of the day until you kick up a big fuss. But, why should this be? If the civil servants adopt a positive attitude towards serving the taxpayers, we would not have so many problems.

People would not have to run around just because some lazy officers refuse to solve the problem brought to their attention.

This is why we still need the Ombudsman to put civil servants on their toes. I look forward to the establishment of Ombudsman Malaysia.



END

MMC-Gamuda only has itself to blame

Photo Credit: https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/446788

By Stephen Ng

After a failed negotiation with the Government, MMC-Gamuda is now looking to be invited for re-negotiation.

This is after the consortium kicked up the dust after the initial negotiations failed.

The statement that the consortium finally issued today to "urge all stakeholders especially (its) staff, subcontractors and suppliers to remain calm" has come too late.

The statement should have been issued earlier without causing any further damage to the government of the day.

The consortium has failed to realise that the rakyat is watching the way it conducts its business. MMC-Gamuda should not think that it can twist the arm of anyone in the Malaysian Government.

Now that it realises that they cannot bully the Government, it wants to go back to the negotiation table without even coming out with a public apology.

The Government should not invite the consortium to the negotiation table again; instead invite them to submit a new tender and compete with other tenderers to see who can deliver the job at a better price to the country.

END.

Gamuda-MMC from my point of view

By Stephen Ng

A number of people asked me what I think about the government's decision to terminate the contract with Gamuda-MMC.

This article will sum up my views. They are strictly my personal views  but before I go on, you should first read an open letter from Tony Pua, political secretary to the Minister of Finance.

The decision was made after careful deliberation by the cabinet. This, of course, followed many rounds of discussions between Lim Guan Eng and his team, with the top management of Gamuda-MMC.

There is no reason why the Malaysian Government would abandon the MRT2 project although its coffers have been left high and dry by the previous regime under Najib Abdul Razak.

With billions of Ringgit being siphoned off, the Pakatan Harapan government which took over Putrajaya has to settle huge debts and repayment of taxes owed to the people.

Naturally, the Government has an obligation to save every single Sen, and use it to pay the debts without creating further burden to the people.

Even the ordinary people were willing to come forward to raise funds to help pay off the RM1 trillion debts incurred by the Najib regime.

Under such circumstances, Gamuda-MMC should not behave like a big boy trying to arm twist the government of the day.

On top of that, they should not kick up a fuss for the failed negotiation. This has turned them into a scorn to the nation.

It appears to me that the campaign that they have hyped up is run by some public relations consultants. Everything appears to be coordinated by some professionals behind the scene.

It goes without saying how much Gamuda-MMC must have paid for these professional campaigners.

Why does Gamuda-MMC have to do this? This is a question that many of us have asked.

It is easy to hype up the numbers and make things look really bad after the government terminated its contract, but Gamuda-MMC as a government contractor must know that under the new Malaysian government, it is no longer business-as-usual for them.

For all Malaysians, a new contractor which can do the job better at a cheaper price would still be the best option.

I should also add the following comments by an engineer in the construction industry:

"Yeah I guess the previous government has indeed created a group of spoiled brat cronies.... Not forgetting that for the longest time Gamuda has been the biggest bully of all.... Bullying even the likes of IJM, SUNWAY and others.... And saving every penny they can is the correct way forward ....which is exactly the government we wanted to vote in...."

After all, we are also consumers. If we find that Pallas shoes are much better in quality than Bata, why should we spend so much to buy the Bata shoes?

END

An Open Letter to MMC-Gamuda

An Open Letter to MMC-Gamuda

By Tony Pua
Political Secretary to Minister of Finance
Member of Parliament for Damansara
10 Oct 2018



Dear Directors of MMC-Gamuda,

Let me applaud you for putting up a great show since the Minister of Finance, Lim Guan Eng announced the Cabinet decision to

(i) accept the offer from MMC-Gamuda to reduce the cost of the MRT2 Above Ground works by RM5.2 billion to RM17.4 billion (23% reduction) in the form of a turnkey contract and

(ii) terminate the Underground contract as both parties could not reach an agreement on the required price reduction.

You have issued a letter proclaiming innocence, claiming that you were awaiting for an offer from the Ministry of Finance (MoF).  You questioned the qualifications of the independent engineering consultant we have engaged. You implied that the decision to terminate was hasty and ill-conceived.  You sought sympathy claiming the loss of jobs for no less than 20,000 people (wow!).  Your social media actively promoted a campaign to “Save 20,000 Jobs” asking Malaysians to sign the petition.  There are viral Whatsapp letters from first class honours engineers regretting support for Pakatan Harapan in the last general election.

The performance and mobilisation of the above campaign are nothing short of impressive.  The question of cost of the project to the Government was conveniently ignored.

We had no intention of engaging with you in a public war of words. We tend to reserve that for our political opponents.  And after all, we wanted to continue the good working relationship to complete the RM17.42 billion worth of Above Ground works.

However, the obvious brazen attempt to paint yourself an innocent victim to an unjust Harapan government required a response to set the facts right and record straight.

1. The original Underground contract was awarded for RM15.49 billion. MRT Corp awarded additional RM1.2 billion of variation orders which resulted in the revised contract value of RM16.71 billion.

2. After numerous meetings and discussions, you wrote to the Minister on 15 August to offer a revised price of RM15.1 billion.  This was mostly a result of shelving the 2 underground stations at Bandar Malaysia North and South.

3. Subsequently on 7 Sep, you offered to reduce the price further to RM14.58 billion for the Underground contract (making it RM32 billion for the entire MRT2 project).  This represented a cost saving of RM2.13 billion or a 12.7% reduction.  In the words of the Gamuda director at the meeting with the Minister on 4 Sep – “we offer what we can offer, but anything beyond that will be meaningless to continue”.

4. However, based on the study by the independent engineering consultant, MRT Corp should expect total savings between RM4.19 to RM5.79 billion for the estimated remaining 60% portion of works yet to be completed.  Yes, this potential savings is just for the balance of works to be completed.  Imagine the potential savings if it was for the entire contract.

So the question to be deliberated upon by this new Pakatan Harapan government is very simple.

A. Do we say, “it’s OK la, let’s just accept the RM2.13 billion reduction offered by MMC Gamuda”?  After all, we can take this figure and boast to Malaysians of our ‘magnificent’ achievement, for they would know no better that we might have left another RM2 billion of potential savings on the table. Furthermore, it will certainly save us the trouble of having to deal with the negative publicity and the new international tender exercise which has to be carried out. Too much work... Or

B. Do we honour the mandate and trust the people has given us and maximise the savings we can reasonably derive from the project? RM2 billion can pay for 5 hospitals, or 50 schools. RM2 billion is hell of a lot of money when I see my MoF colleagues who are struggling and scrimping to find RM50 million savings here, and RM80 million cuts there for the upcoming Budget.

The Cabinet obviously made the decision to pick the latter.  And you seriously telling Malaysians to blame the Cabinet for the termination?

Or would you then pick a different target, as you implied in your media statement, that the independent consulting engineers aren’t sufficiently qualified – despite employing more than 500 staff with a track record of having completed more than 80 projects in 24 countries outside of Malaysia?

Or was it because the government-appointed independent consulting engineer exposed the frequently expounded lie that the cost of MRT1 and MRT2 are well-below the average cost of construction of various Asian Metros, because no one was actually able to substantiate the data provided?

Should we instead question why MMC Gamuda had initially agreed to, but subsequently refused to share costing data with the independent consulting engineer to justify its cost, claiming “trade secrets”?

To the 26 year old first-class honours engineering graduate, I empathize the turbulence you are facing in your life today which is due to no fault of yours.  However, should Gamuda decides not to retain your services, it would only be their loss, because you would build an equally successful career in many other companies.

To the purported 20,000 workers who, according to MMC Gamuda, would lose their jobs as a result of the underground contract termination, let me emphasize that the Malaysian government is not terminating the project.  You will find plenty of opportunities when the new project is awarded at a lower cost, while the savings generated would mean even more projects for the future.

But perhaps, instead of starting a petition on Change.org to seek the Government to reverse its decision on the termination, it might be more productive to start a petition to ask your bosses at MMC Gamuda to make the Malaysian government an offer they cannot refuse.

Thank you.